Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We study a dynamic contribution game where investors seek private benefits offered in exchange for contributions, and a single, publicly minded donor values project success. We show that donor contributions serve as costly signals that encourage socially productive contributions by investors who face a coordination problem. Investors and the donor prefer different equilibria, but all benefit in expectation from the donor’s ability to dynamically signal his valuation. We explore various contexts in which our model can be applied and delve empirically into the case of Kickstarter. We calibrate our model and quantify the coordination benefits of dynamic signaling in counterfactuals. (JEL C73, D26, D82, G32, L26, M13)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Deb et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e55b5ae2b3180350ef8eb3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181851
Joyee Deb
Aniko Öry
Kevin Williams
American Economic Review
Yale University
New York University
Carnegie Mellon University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...