Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based care of extremely preterm infants (28 weeks’ gestation) depends heavily on research in which a primary outcome is infant neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), yet it is unclear how well NDI in infancy predicts long-term NDI. In this study, we aim to assess the relationship between 2- and 10-year neurodevelopment using a well-known 2-year definition and a 10-year definition developed by an expert panel. METHODS: Using data from the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborn Study cohort, we classified 2-year NDI using definitions developed by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. We classified 10-year NDI using definitions developed by an expert panel, which added epilepsy and ASD at 10 years. RESULTS: Of 1506 infants, 80% survived. Data sufficient to classify severity of NDI at both 2 and 10 years were available for 67% of survivors (n = 802). Among children classified as having moderate to severe NDI at 2 years, 63% had none to mild NDI at 10 years; among children classified as having profound NDI at 2 years, 36% had none to mild NDI at 10 years. Cohen’s κ statistic indicated minimal to fair agreement between NDI at 2 and 10 years (0.34, P .001). CONCLUSIONS: NDI in infancy, as defined in this study, only weakly predicts NDI in middle childhood. For the parents at risk for delivery of an extremely preterm infant, a hopeful message can be taken from our findings that one-third of surviving children classified as having profound NDI and nearly two-thirds of those classified as having moderate to severe NDI at 2 years had none to mild NDI at 10 years.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Genevieve Taylor
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert M. Joseph
Boston University
Karl Kuban
Boston University
PEDIATRICS
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Boston University
Boston Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Taylor et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1951ae001a20a9c0d9506d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-001040
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: