Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract With the rapid proliferation of Internet technologies and applications, misuse of online messages for inappropriate or illegal purposes has become a major concern for society. The anonymous nature of online‐message distribution makes identity tracing a critical problem. We developed a framework for authorship identification of online messages to address the identity‐tracing problem. In this framework, four types of writing‐style features (lexical, syntactic, structural, and content‐specific features) are extracted and inductive learning algorithms are used to build feature‐based classification models to identify authorship of online messages. To examine this framework, we conducted experiments on English and Chinese online‐newsgroup messages. We compared the discriminating power of the four types of features and of three classification techniques: decision trees, backpropagation neural networks, and support vector machines. The experimental results showed that the proposed approach was able to identify authors of online messages with satisfactory accuracy of 70 to 95%. All four types of message features contributed to discriminating authors of online messages. Support vector machines outperformed the other two classification techniques in our experiments. The high performance we achieved for both the English and Chinese datasets showed the potential of this approach in a multiple‐language context.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rong Zheng
Jiangsu Second Normal University
Jiexun Li
Decision Sciences (United States)
Hsinchun Chen
University of Arizona
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
New York University
University of Arizona
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zheng et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a177b1aa0e670aec86e9f59 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20316
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: