Pharmacist-led hypertension care in barbershops gained 0.06 QALYs at a cost of $42,717 per QALY, indicating high cost-effectiveness in non-Hispanic Black men.
Does 1 year of pharmacist-led hypertension management in Black barbershops improve quality-adjusted life-years and prove cost-effective compared to barber education alone in Black men with uncontrolled hypertension?
Pharmacist-led hypertension management in Black-owned barbershops is a highly cost-effective strategy to improve blood pressure control and reduce cardiovascular risk in Black men over 10 years.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Background: In LABBPS (Los Angeles Barbershop Blood Pressure Study), pharmacist-led hypertension care in Los Angeles County Black-owned barbershops significantly improved blood pressure control in non-Hispanic Black men with uncontrolled hypertension at baseline. In this analysis, 10-year health outcomes and health care costs of 1 year of the LABBPS intervention versus control are projected. Methods: A discrete event simulation of hypertension care processes projected blood pressure, medication-related adverse events, fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease events, and noncardiovascular disease death in LABBPS participants. Program costs, total direct health care costs (2019 US dollars), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated for the LABBPS intervention and control arms from a health care sector perspective over a 10-year horizon. Future costs and QALYs were discounted 3% annually. High and intermediate cost-effectiveness thresholds were defined as <50 000 and <150 000 per QALY gained, respectively. Results: At 10 years, the intervention was projected to cost an average of 2356 (95% uncertainty interval, –264 to 4611) more per participant than the control arm and gain 0. 06 (95% uncertainty interval, 0. 01–0. 10) QALYs. The LABBPS intervention was highly cost-effective, with a mean cost of 42 717 per QALY gained (58% probability of being highly and 96% of being at least intermediately cost-effective). Exclusive use of generic drugs improved the cost-effectiveness to 17 162 per QALY gained. The LABBPS intervention would be only intermediately cost-effective if pharmacists were less likely to intensify antihypertensive medications when systolic blood pressure was ≥150 mm Hg or if pharmacist weekly time driving to barbershops increased. Conclusions: Hypertension care delivered by clinical pharmacists in Black barbershops is a highly cost-effective way to improve blood pressure control in Black men.
Bryant et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Pharmacist-led hypertension care in barbershops gained 0.06 QALYs at a cost of $42,717 per QALY, indicating high cost-effectiveness in non-Hispanic Black men.