Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article addresses the challenges solidarity poses for the development of Precision Medicine (PM). Solidarity is invoked in calls for a new ‘social contract’ for PM, seeking to promote participation in PM by emphasizing reciprocity between contributions to and benefits from this new branch of medicine. In this context, there is a need for further conceptualization with regard to what qualifies as solidarity and how solidarity is performed in Precision Medicine initiatives. We address these conceptual gaps that have important practical implications for PM’s development, most notably for agendas of public engagement and trust. We argue that solidarity does not only represent a value but also takes on infrastructural forms, shaping how PM is practiced in, for example, healthcare delivery systems. Next, we empirically probe how solidarity is invoked in PM initiatives in the United States (‘All of Us’-Program) and Europe (the UK 100,000 Genomes Project and the French 2025 Genomics Plan). Based on this analysis, we argue that the infrastructural dimension of solidarity forms a vital precondition to build trust in PM. Echoing the famous motto of The Three Musketeers, ‘One for all, all for one’, PM policies cannot just proclaim solidarity for the gathering of data alone (‘One for all’) without caring about delivery of benefits of PM (‘All for one’). We conclude by proposing an empirical research agenda for studying infrastructural formations to secure solidarity in the implementation of PM practices across national contexts.
Hoyweghen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.