Low-income families with a heart failure patient had significantly higher odds of experiencing high (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.3-6.6) and catastrophic (OR 14.2; 95% CI 5.1-39.5) financial burden.
Cross-Sectional (n=788)
Does low income increase the risk of financial toxicity in families with heart failure?
Patients with heart failure and their families face substantial out-of-pocket healthcare expenses, with low-income families experiencing disproportionately high rates of financial toxicity.
Effect estimate: OR 3.9 (95% CI 2.3-6.6)
Background Heart failure (HF) poses a major public health burden in the United States. We examined the burden of out-of-pocket healthcare costs on patients with HF and their families. Methods and Results In the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we identified all families with ≥1 adult member with HF during 2014 to 2018. Total out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures included yearly care-specific costs and insurance premiums. We evaluated 2 outcomes of financial toxicity: (1) high financial burden-total out-of-pocket healthcare expense to postsubsistence income ratio of >20%, and (2) catastrophic financial burden with the ratio of >40%-a bankrupting expense defined by the World Health Organization. There were 788 families in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey with a member with HF representing 0. 54% (95% CI, 0. 48%-0. 60%) of all families nationally. The overall mean annual out-of-pocket healthcare expenses were 4423 (95% CI, 3908-4939), with medications and health insurance premiums representing the largest categories of cost. Overall, 14% (95% CI, 11%-18%) of families experienced a high burden and 5% (95% CI, 3%-6%) experienced a catastrophic burden. Among the two-fifths of families considered low income, 24% (95% CI, 18%-30%) experienced a high financial burden, whereas 10% (95% CI, 6%-14%) experienced a catastrophic burden. Low-income families had 4-fold greater risk-adjusted odds of high financial burden (odds ratio OR, 3. 9; 95% CI, 2. 3-6. 6), and 14-fold greater risk-adjusted odds of catastrophic financial burden (OR, 14. 2; 95% CI, 5. 1-39. 5) compared with middle/high-income families. Conclusions Patients with HF and their families experience large out-of-pocket healthcare expenses. A large proportion encounter financial toxicity, with a disproportionate effect on low-income families.
Wang et al. (Sun,) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=788). Low income vs. Middle/high-income families was evaluated on High financial burden (total out-of-pocket healthcare expense to postsubsistence income ratio >20%) (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.3-6.6). Low-income families with a heart failure patient had significantly higher odds of experiencing high (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.3-6.6) and catastrophic (OR 14.2; 95% CI 5.1-39.5) financial burden.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: