Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Although systematic reviews are the method of choice to synthesize scientific evidence, they can take years to complete and publish. Clinicians, managers, and policy-makers often need input from scientific evidence in a more timely and resource-efficient manner. For this purpose, rapid reviews are conducted. Rapid reviews are performed using an accelerated process. However, they should not be less systematic than standard systematic reviews, and the introduction of bias must be avoided. In this article, we describe what rapid reviews are, present their characteristics, give some examples, highlight potential pitfalls, and draw attention to the importance of evidence summaries in order to facilitate adoption in clinical decision-making.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Philip Moons
Adult Congenital Heart Disease
Eva Goossens
University of Antwerp
David R. Thompson
Wesleyan University
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
The University of Melbourne
KU Leuven
Monash University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Moons et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69de7c2d6e50a6aba3e93c60 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab041