This study protocol outlines a prospective, multicenter trial of up to 150 patients across 7 centers to evaluate the detection rate of right to left shunt using robotic-assisted TCD versus TTE.
Does novel robotic-assisted TCD with bubbles improve the detection of right to left shunt compared to standard TTE in adult patients with suspected embolic stroke or TIA?
This study protocol describes a multicenter prospective trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel robotic-assisted transcranial Doppler system for detecting right-to-left shunts in stroke/TIA patients.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Right to left shunt (RLS), from patent foramen ovale (PFO) or elsewhere, is a recognized risk factor for stroke. Current standard of care for RLS diagnosis includes transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) which is insensitive, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) which is invasive, and transcranial Doppler (TCD) which has excellent sensitivity and specificity for RLS but is heavily operator dependent and expertise is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the RLS detection rate of a novel robotic-assisted TCD (ra-TCD) to standard of care diagnostic techniques, including TTE, TEE, and TCD. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, nonsignificant risk device study of ra-TCD versus TTE for RLS diagnosis in adult patients who present with neurological signs and symptoms that include embolic stroke or transient ischemic attack on the differential diagnosis. Up to 150 subjects will be enrolled at up to seven centers considering the prevalence of PFO, suboptimal transtemporal windows, and potential dropouts. Enrolled patients will undergo ra-TCD supine and at 45° in a manner otherwise in line with standard of care TCD bubble technique. The enrolled patients will have undergone TTE, and optionally standard TCD and TEE, per usual care. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint is percent detection of RLS by ra-TCD compared against TTE. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of device-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter, prospective study evaluating the accuracy, feasibility, and safety of novel ra-TCD for the diagnosis of RLS as compared to standard of care diagnostics.
Rubin et al. (2021) studied Right to left shunt (n=150). Robotic-assisted transcranial Doppler (ra-TCD) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated on Percent detection of RLS by ra-TCD compared against TTE. This study protocol outlines a prospective, multicenter trial of up to 150 patients across 7 centers to evaluate the detection rate of right to left shunt using robotic-assisted TCD versus TTE.