Adults with or at risk of developing cardiovascular disease
Guideline-directed management and therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (including lifestyle modifications, blood pressure lowering, and statin therapy)
The 2019 ACC/AHA guideline provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Assessment of ASCVD risk remains the foundation of primary prevention. Although all individuals should be encouraged to follow a heart-healthy lifestyle, estimating an individual’s 10-year absolute ASCVD risk enables matching the intensity of preventive interventions to the patient’s absolute risk, to maximize anticipated benefit and minimize potential harm from overtreatment. The 10-year ASCVD risk estimate is used to guide decision-making for many preventive interventions, including lipid management ( S2.2-4 , S2.2-36 ) and BP management ( S2.2-37 ); it should be the start of a conversation with the patient about risk-reducing strategies (the “clinician–patient discussion”) and not the sole decision factor for the initiation of pharmacotherapy ( S2.2-4 , S2.2-36 , S2.2-38 ). All risk estimation tools have inherent limitations, and population-based risk scores must be interpreted in light of specific circumstances for individual patients. The PCE have been shown to overestimate ( S2.2-15 , S2.2-39 – S2.2-47 ) or underestimate ( S2.2-12 , S2.2-48 – S2.2-51 ) ASCVD risk for certain subgroups. Thus, after calculation of the PCE, it is reasonable to use additional risk-enhancing factors to guide decisions about preventive interventions for borderline- or intermediate-risk adults ( S2.2-4 – S2.2-14 ). However, the value of preventive therapy may remain uncertain for many individuals with borderline or intermediate estimated 10-year risk, and some patients may be reluctant to take medical therapy without clearer evidence of increased ASCVD risk. For these individuals, the assessment of coronary artery calcium is a reasonable tool to reclassify risk either upward or downward, as part of shared decision-making. For younger adults 20 to 59 years of age, estimation of lifetime risk may be considered. For adults >75 years of age, the clinician and patient should engage in a discussion about the possible benefits of preventive therapies appropriate to the age group in the context of comorbidities and life expectancy.
“We made the social determinants of health front and center. With many people, clinicians don't ask whether they have access to healthy foods or a way to get to the pharmacy. Asking about these issues is step one.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Donna K. Arnett
Roger S. Blumenthal
Michelle A. Albert
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arnett et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e69843c715c26d55d593e6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010