Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: The Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) serve as the platform for quantitative risk assessment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Data are sparse regarding the benefit of adding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures to the PCE. We sought to estimate the association of HRQoL with ASCVD events and evaluate the potential utility of adding HRQoL to the PCE in refining quantitative risk assessment for primary prevention decisions. METHODS: Three multi-ethnic longitudinal cohorts were included in the study. HRQoL was measured using the SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS); higher PCS or MCS scores indicate better HRQoL. We constructed a four-level HRQoL status variable: MCS <50 and PCS <50; MCS <50 and PCS ≥50; MCS ≥50 and PCS <50; MCS ≥50 and PCS ≥50. Harrell's C statistics and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analyses were used to assess the added predictive ability of HRQoL for incident ASCVD. RESULTS: <0.01) modestly when added to PCE; 3% and 6% of individuals with events were correctly reclassified to higher risk in the overall sample and low risk subgroup, respectively. CONCLUSION: HRQoL is an independent predictor of ASCVD events, and improves ASCVD risk prediction significantly, though modestly, overall and in low-risk individuals. HRQoL may be a cost-effective risk-enhancing factor for refining quantitative risk assessment for primary prevention decisions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hongyan Ning
Preventive Cardiology
Kiarri N. Kershaw
General / Preventive / Lipids
Norrina B. Allen
Preventive Cardiology
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Northwestern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ning et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2264c339da1a1e72910168 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100222
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: