Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Advances in labour‐saving technology have sparked a public debate about the ‘Future of Work’. An important role in this debate is played by policy‐focused literature produced by institutions such as government agencies, international organisations, think tanks, and consulting firms. Using qualitative coding, the present study analyses this ‘grey’ literature (a total of 195 documents published in English 2013–2018) with a focus on what problem perceptions, frames, and policy recommendations prevail in this literature. We find that the dominant narrative treats technological advances as a prime cause of challenges in the labour market and places the main responsibility on the shoulders of individuals in the form of ‘upskilling’. We show how versions of this narrative vary across different types of institutions, what types of organisations are the most prolific publishers of policy papers in this space, and we offer a critique of dominant narratives within the ‘Future of Work’ discourse.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lukas Schlögl
FWF Austrian Science Fund
Elias Weiss
University of Vienna
Barbara Prainsack
University of Vienna
New Technology Work and Employment
University of Vienna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schlögl et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a199b1e196cd56b09ea7687 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12202
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: