Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We consider a seller who can dynamically adjust the price of a product at the individual customer level, by utilizing information about customers’ characteristics encoded as a d-dimensional feature vector. We assume a personalized demand model, parameters of which depend on s out of the d features. The seller initially does not know the relationship between the customer features and the product demand but learns this through sales observations over a selling horizon of T periods. We prove that the seller’s expected regret, that is, the revenue loss against a clairvoyant who knows the underlying demand relationship, is at least of order Formula: see text under any admissible policy. We then design a near-optimal pricing policy for a semiclairvoyant seller (who knows which s of the d features are in the demand model) who achieves an expected regret of order Formula: see text. We extend this policy to a more realistic setting, where the seller does not know the true demand predictors, and show that this policy has an expected regret of order Formula: see text, which is also near-optimal. Finally, we test our theory on simulated data and on a data set from an online auto loan company in the United States. On both data sets, our experimentation-based pricing policy is superior to intuitive and/or widely-practiced customized pricing methods, such as myopic pricing and segment-then-optimize policies. Furthermore, our policy improves upon the loan company’s historical pricing decisions by 47% in expected revenue over a six-month period. This paper was accepted by Noah Gans, stochastic models and simulation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gah‐Yi Ban
N. Bora Keskin
Management Science
Duke University
University of Maryland, College Park
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ban et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6f63a99397875bbaa7ed9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3680
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: