Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We present CO2 emission estimates for twenty power plants and related facilities in the United States, India, South Africa, Poland, Russia and South Korea, derived from space-based CO2 observations from NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite. Improvements to OCO-2 data quality and to our methodology yield improved results relative to earlier work. These new results include emission quantification for both larger and smaller power plants, the first power plant emission estimate based on ocean glint data and emissions from a small city with multiple industrial facilities. CO2 emission estimates are compared against reported facility emissions where available, including high temporal resolution data for the eight US sites. The difference with respect to reported values for the US sites ranges from 1.4% to 26.7%, with a mean of 15.1%, although the estimated emission sum for all US sites is within 0.8% of the reported value, suggesting the errors are largely random. This finding reinforces the importance of revisit rate for future space-based emission monitoring systems and furthermore confirms that making multiple overpasses of a power plant can reduce errors to an accuracy useful to support climate policy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ray Nassar
Langley Research Center
Jon‐Paul Mastrogiacomo
University of Toronto
William Bateman-Hemphill
University of Waterloo
Remote Sensing of Environment
Colorado State University
University of Waterloo
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nassar et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d750ccb54ccf0cfef30d71 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112579
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: