Technology-enabled home blood pressure monitoring with tele-consultation improved blood pressure control (P<0.05) and was cost-effective compared to usual care (ICER S$23,935.14/QALY).
Cohort (n=240)
No
Does technology-enabled home blood pressure monitoring improve blood pressure control and cost-effectiveness in patients with hypertension?
Technology-enabled home blood pressure monitoring with tele-support improves blood pressure control and is cost-effective in an Asian primary care setting.
p-value: p=<0.05
INTRODUCTION: Technology to enhance hypertension management is increasingly used in primary care; however, it has not been evaluated in an Asian primary care setting. We aimed to understand the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of a technology-enabled home blood pressure monitor when deployed in primary care, and patients' perspectives about the technology. METHODS: A quasi-experimental cohort study was conducted in a polyclinic in Singapore. In total, 120 patients with hypertension were assigned to the telemonitoring intervention group. Patients received a home blood pressure device connected to the clinical care team's dashboard through a mobile gateway. Tele-consultations and nurse-led tele-support were carried out using established clinical protocols. In total, 120 patients assigned to the control group continued to receive usual care in the polyclinic. Clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction were measured 6 months after recruitment. RESULTS: < 0. 05). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for all patients was S23, 935. 14/quality-adjusted life year (<1 gross domestic product per capita), which was very cost-effective based on World Health Organization cost-effectiveness thresholds. There was greater satisfaction in telemonitoring intervention group relating to the convenience of recording and sharing blood pressure measurements with the health care team, consultation advice received, understanding by the health care team of their condition, and were more motivated to monitor their blood pressure. DISCUSSION: Telemonitoring with tele-consultation improved blood pressure control and was more cost-effective than usual care. Patients receiving telemonitoring intervention were also more motivated and satisfied with their care.
Teo et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=240). Technology-enabled home blood pressure monitor with tele-consultations and nurse-led tele-support vs. Usual care was evaluated on Clinical outcomes (blood pressure control), cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction (p=<0.05). Technology-enabled home blood pressure monitoring with tele-consultation improved blood pressure control (P<0.05) and was cost-effective compared to usual care (ICER S$23,935.14/QALY).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: