Atrial cardiomyopathy is an emerging potential mechanism of embolic stroke of undetermined source, suggesting that targeted anticoagulant therapy may be more applicable to these specific patients.
Does anticoagulant therapy prevent recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS and atrial cardiomyopathy?
Atrial cardiomyopathy is proposed as a key underlying mechanism for embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), suggesting a potential targeted role for anticoagulation in this specific subgroup.
Nearly 30% of ischemic strokes have an unknown cause, which are referred to as cryptogenic strokes (CS). Imaging studies suggest that a large proportion of these patients show features that are consistent with embolism, and thus the term embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) was proposed to describe these CS patients. Atrial cardiomyopathy predisposes to thrombus formation and thus embolic stroke even in the absence of atrial fibrillation (AF). This may provide a mechanistic link with ESUS, suggesting that anticoagulant therapy may be more beneficial than antiplatelet therapy in ESUS patients with atrial cardiomyopathy. The present review discusses the concept of atrial cardiomyopathy and ESUS and the relationship between them based on the mechanisms and clinical evidence, suggests that atrial cardiomyopathy may be a potential mechanism of ESUS, and highlights a theoretical basis that supports that anticoagulant therapy may be more applicable to ESUS patients with atrial cardiomyopathy and aims to help us better understand and identify the risk of ESUS, thereby improving the management of these patients in clinical practice.
Ning et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS). Anticoagulant therapy vs. Antiplatelet therapy was evaluated. Atrial cardiomyopathy is an emerging potential mechanism of embolic stroke of undetermined source, suggesting that targeted anticoagulant therapy may be more applicable to these specific patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: