Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a revolutionary treatment modality used to treat haematological malignancies. Lymphocytes are engineered to produce CARs directed towards tumour cell antigens. Clinical trials have demonstrated impressive malignancy-related outcomes. Unfortunately, numerous off-target effects can cause toxicity-related adverse events in this population, the main being cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell neurotoxicity syndrome. This causes significant patient morbidity and poor outcomes. Patients who receive CAR T-cell therapy are also profoundly immunosuppressed and often cytopenic, which is caused by a multitude of patient- and treatment-related factors. Thus, infection-related complications are also common in this group. Indeed, up to one third of patients will suffer a serious bacterial infection in the first 30 days after therapy. Viral respiratory tract infection appears to be the most common during the late phase and can be severe; one patient has died of influenza A infection. Fungal infection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation appear to be uncommon. Although institutional guidelines on infection-prevention strategies are available, there is a dearth of evidence to support their approach. Future research needs to target important unanswered questions that remain in this patient population in order to improve their short- and long-term outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adam G. Stewart
Andrea Henden
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
The University of Queensland
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stewart et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dea2d66bae133e7de946a5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361211036773
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: