Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Summary In this study, we propose and examine an integrative framework to investigate factors contributing to the experience of workplace incivility (including victim demography, dispositional individual differences, and environmental factors); the affective, health‐related, social exchange‐based, and behavioral outcomes associated with experienced incivility; and boundary conditions for their relationships. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive meta‐analysis on the antecedents and consequences of experienced workplace incivility based on 253 statistically independent samples from 219 primary studies and examine several moderators such as differences in time‐related research design (cross‐sectional vs. time‐lagged), incivility instigator source, and occupation. Further, by integrating meta‐analytic effect sizes from the current study with effect sizes from existing meta‐analyses, we also investigate the extent to which the impact of experienced incivility on outcomes differs from that of higher intensity forms of workplace mistreatment inclusive of bullying, abusive supervision, and sexual harassment, thereby enhancing understanding regarding the nomological net of experienced incivility in comparison with more intense forms of workplace mistreatment. We discuss the implications of these findings along with study limitations and future directions for incivility scholarship.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Soojung Han
Crystal M. Harold
In‐Sue Oh
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Temple University
California State University Los Angeles
West Chester University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77706aa68b335b4f319eb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2568
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: