Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Rigorous and reproducible methodology of controlling for bias is essential for high-quality, evidence-based studies. Propensity score matching (PSM) is a valuable way to control for bias and achieve pseudo-randomization in retrospective observation studies. The purpose of this review is to 1) provide a clear conceptual framework for PSM, 2) recommend how to best report its use in studies, and 3) offer some practical examples of implementation. First, this article covers the concepts behind PSM, discusses its pros and cons, and compares it with other methods of controlling for bias, namely, hard/exact matching and regression analysis. Second, recommendations are given for what to report in a manuscript when PSM is used. Finally, a worked example is provided, which can also serve as a template for the reader's own studies. A study's conclusions are only as strong as its methods. PSM is an invaluable tool for producing rigorous and reproducible results in observational studies. The goal of this article is to give practicing clinical physicians not only a better understanding of PSM and its implications but the ability to implement it for their own studies. STUDY DESIGN: Review.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeffrey Chen
David R. Maldonado
Brooke L. Kowalski
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
University of California, Los Angeles
Vanderbilt University
American Hip Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc1eb0ea70a37eff955139 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.037
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: