Racial Disparities in Management and Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Complicating Myocardial Infarction: A National Study From England and Wales

BackgroundStudies of racial disparities in care of patients admitted with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have shown inconsistent results. Whether these differences in care exist in the universal healthcare system in United Kingdom is unknown.MethodsPatients admitted with a diagnosis of AMI and OHCA between 2010 and 2017 from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) were studied. All patients were stratified based on ethnicity into a Black, Asian, or minority ethnicity (BAME) group vs a White group. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the predictors of clinical outcomes and treatment strategy.ResultsFrom 14,287 patients admitted with AMI complicated by OHCA, BAME patients constituted a minority of patients (1185 8.3%), compared with a White group (13,102 91.7%). BAME patients were younger (median age interquartile range) for BAME group, 58 50-70 years; for White group, 65 55-74 years). Cardiogenic shock (BAME group, 33%; White group, 20.7%; P < 0.001) and severe left ventricular impairment (BAME group, 21%; White group, 16.5%; P < 0.003) were more frequent among BAME patients. BAME patients were more likely to be seen by a cardiologist (BAME group, 95.9%; White group, 92.5%; P < 0.001) and were more likely to receive coronary angiography than the White group (odds ratio OR 1.5, 95% confidence interval CI 1.2-1.88). The BAME group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.52) and re-infarction (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06-2.18) than the White group.ConclusionsBAME patients were more likely to be seen by a cardiologist and receive coronary angiography than White patients. Despite this difference, the in-hospital mortality of BAME patients, particularly in the Asian population, was significantly higher.