Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The spread of AI-embedded systems involved in human decision making makes studying human trust in these systems critical. However, empirically investigating trust is challenging. One reason is the lack of standard protocols to design trust experiments. In this paper, we present a survey of existing methods to empirically investigate trust in AI-assisted decision making and analyse the corpus along the constitutive elements of an experimental protocol. We find that the definition of trust is not commonly integrated in experimental protocols, which can lead to findings that are overclaimed or are hard to interpret and compare across studies. Drawing from empirical practices in social and cognitive studies on human-human trust, we provide practical guidelines to improve the methodology of studying Human-AI trust in decision-making contexts. In addition, we bring forward research opportunities of two types: one focusing on further investigation regarding trust methodologies and the other on factors that impact Human-AI trust.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oleksandra Vereschak
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Gilles Bailly
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Baptiste Caramiaux
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Sorbonne Université
Institut Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vereschak et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d91f399402b8412aa3c423 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3476068
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: