Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Cognitive ethology explores the ability of animals to flexibly adapt their behavior to rapid physical and social environment fluctuations. Although there is a historical dichotomy between field and captive studies, recently, a growing interest in questions that sit at the intersection of cognitive and adaptive perspectives has helped bridge this divide. By focusing on Theropithecus gelada, we discuss the three main reasons why this hybrid approach is extremely successful. First, captive and wild studies provide data at different social, spatial, and temporal scales that can be synthesized to give a fuller picture of the behavior. Secondly, apparently conflicting results from captive and wild settings are powerful tools to explore behavioral flexibility and latent behavioral tendencies. Third, the different settings provide ways of validating and exploring behaviors that are noticed in the other setting. Although we were able to bring together our captive and wild research to demonstrate these ideas, we could have obtained a more integrated vision on the proximate and ultimate gelada behavioral and cognitive strategies if we had considered this hybrid approach from the beginning. We hope that this manuscript stimulates scholars in designing their studies by taking into account the incredible potential of a complementary captive-wild research approach.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elisabetta Palagi
University of Pisa
Thore J. Bergman
University of Michigan
Animals
University of Michigan
University of Pisa
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Palagi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a175b50fb37ff6cad6e8d10 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11103003
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: