Ticagrelor reduced the risk of new stroke at 90 days compared to clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA (6.0% vs 7.6%; HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.94; P=0.008).
RCT (n=6,412)
Double-blind
1:1
Does ticagrelor reduce new stroke in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA compared to clopidogrel?
In CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA, ticagrelor modestly reduces the risk of new stroke at 90 days compared to clopidogrel, without increasing severe or moderate bleeding.
Hazard Ratio: 0.77 (95% CI 0.64–0.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 7.6%
p-value: p=0.008
BACKGROUND: loss-of-function carriers have not been extensively performed. METHODS: loss-of-function alleles. Patients were assigned within 24 hours after symptom onset, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive ticagrelor (180 mg on day 1 followed by 90 mg twice daily on days 2 through 90) and placebo clopidogrel or to receive clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 followed by 75 mg once daily on days 2 through 90) and placebo ticagrelor; both groups received aspirin for 21 days. The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke, and the primary safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding, both within 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 11,255 patients were screened and 6412 patients were enrolled, with 3205 assigned to the ticagrelor group and 3207 to the clopidogrel group. The median age of the patients was 64.8 years, and 33.8% were women; 98.0% belonged to the Han Chinese ethnic group. Stroke occurred within 90 days in 191 patients (6.0%) in the ticagrelor group and 243 patients (7.6%) in the clopidogrel group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.94; P = 0.008). Secondary outcomes were generally in the same direction as the primary outcome. Severe or moderate bleeding occurred in 9 patients (0.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 11 patients (0.3%) in the clopidogrel group; any bleeding occurred in 170 patients (5.3%) and 80 patients (2.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: loss-of-function alleles, the risk of stroke at 90 days was modestly lower with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. The risk of severe or moderate bleeding did not differ between the two treatment groups, but ticagrelor was associated with more total bleeding events than clopidogrel. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China and others; CHANCE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04078737.).
Wang et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Stroke or TIA in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers (n=6,412). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 followed by 75 mg once daily on days 2 through 90) was evaluated on new stroke within 90 days (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.94, p=0.008). Ticagrelor reduced the risk of new stroke at 90 days compared to clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA (6.0% vs 7.6%; HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.94; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: