Multisite conduction block in the epicardial substrate of Brugada syndrome

BackgroundThe Brugada pattern manifests as a spontaneous variability of the electrocardiographic marker, suggesting a variability of the underlying electrical substrate.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the response of the epicardial substrate of Brugada syndrome (BrS) to programmed ventricular stimulation and to Na blocker infusion.MethodsWe investigated 6 patients (all male; mean age 54 ± 14 years) with BrS and recurrent ventricular fibrillation. Five had no type 1 BrS electrocardiogram pattern at admission. They underwent combined epicardial-endocardial mapping using multielectrode catheters. Changes in epicardial electrograms were evaluated during single endocardial extrastimulation and after low-dose ajmaline infusion (0.5 mg/kg in 5 minutes).ResultsAll patients had a region in the anterior epicardial right ventricle with prolonged multicomponent electrograms. Single extrastimulation prolonged late epicardial components by 59 ± 31 ms and in 4 patients abolished epicardial components at some sites, without reactivation by surrounding activated sites. These localized blocks occurred at an initial coupling interval of 335 ± 58 ms and then expanded to other sites, being observed in up to 40% of epicardial sites. Ajmaline infusion prolonged electrogram duration in all and produced localized blocks in 62% of sites in the same patients as during extrastimulation. Epicardial conduction recovery after ajmaline occurred intermittently and at discontinuous sites and produced beat-to-beat changes in local repolarization, resulting in an area of marked electrical disparity. These changes were consistent with models based on microstructural alterations under critical propagation conditions.ConclusionIn BrS, localized functional conduction blocks occur at multiple epicardial sites and with variable patterns, without being reactivated from the surrounding sites. The Brugada pattern manifests as a spontaneous variability of the electrocardiographic marker, suggesting a variability of the underlying electrical substrate. The purpose of this study was to investigate the response of the epicardial substrate of Brugada syndrome (BrS) to programmed ventricular stimulation and to Na blocker infusion. We investigated 6 patients (all male; mean age 54 ± 14 years) with BrS and recurrent ventricular fibrillation. Five had no type 1 BrS electrocardiogram pattern at admission. They underwent combined epicardial-endocardial mapping using multielectrode catheters. Changes in epicardial electrograms were evaluated during single endocardial extrastimulation and after low-dose ajmaline infusion (0.5 mg/kg in 5 minutes). All patients had a region in the anterior epicardial right ventricle with prolonged multicomponent electrograms. Single extrastimulation prolonged late epicardial components by 59 ± 31 ms and in 4 patients abolished epicardial components at some sites, without reactivation by surrounding activated sites. These localized blocks occurred at an initial coupling interval of 335 ± 58 ms and then expanded to other sites, being observed in up to 40% of epicardial sites. Ajmaline infusion prolonged electrogram duration in all and produced localized blocks in 62% of sites in the same patients as during extrastimulation. Epicardial conduction recovery after ajmaline occurred intermittently and at discontinuous sites and produced beat-to-beat changes in local repolarization, resulting in an area of marked electrical disparity. These changes were consistent with models based on microstructural alterations under critical propagation conditions. In BrS, localized functional conduction blocks occur at multiple epicardial sites and with variable patterns, without being reactivated from the surrounding sites.