Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the electromyography (EMG) score during contraction of a given muscle to the independently measured manual muscle test (MMT) score for that same muscle (or muscle group), to determine whether EMG measures could serve as a reasonable approximation of muscle contraction force in persons with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: We examined the strength of relationship between surface-recorded EMG and estimated muscle strength using the MMT in a population of 45 subjects with acute (<1 week) traumatic SCI. Eight different muscle groups were compared in each individual; measures were repeated on these subjects approximately 2 months later. A 6-point numeric index was used for assignment of EMG scores, all of which were done in a blinded fashion by 1 investigator from tape-recorded evaluations. RESULTS: Nearly all of the individual muscle comparisons led to positive and significant (P < .01) correlations between EMG and MMT scores, at both the acute and subacute time points following injury. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of EMG scoring as an indicator of recovery of volitional strength following SCI in a given subject. However, caution must be used when attempting to extrapolate EMG scores to absolute forces or when comparing EMG scores among different subjects.
Calancie et al. (Mon,) studied this question.