Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: The enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach is becoming increasingly more widely accepted as a promising technique in the treatment of ventral hernia. However, evidence is still lacking regarding the perioperative, postoperative and long-term outcomes of this technique. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the current available evidence regarding the perioperative and short-term outcomes of ventral hernia repair using eTEP. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science electronic databases to identify studies on the laparoscopic or robotic-enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach for the treatment of ventral hernia. A pooled meta-analysis was performed. The primary end point was focused on short-term outcomes regarding perioperative characteristics and postoperative parameters. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were identified involving 918 patients. Minimally invasive eTEP resulted in a rate of surgical site infection of 0% 95% CI 0.0-1.0%, a rate of seroma of 5% 95% CI 2.0-8.0% and a rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) of 1% 95% CI 0.0-3.0%. The rate of intraoperative complications was 2% 95% CI 0.0-4.0% with a conversion rate of 1.0% 95% CI 0.0-3.0%. Mean hospital length of stay was 1.77 days 95% CI 1.21-2.24. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months (1-24), the rate of recurrence was 1% 95% CI 0.0-1.0%. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive eTEP is a safe and effective approach for ventral hernia repair, with low reported intraoperative complications and good outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Daniel Aliseda
Carlos Sánchez‐Justicia
Gabriel Zozaya
Hernia
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Navarre Institute of Health Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aliseda et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e979ef59e0974004c4272 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02557-8
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: