Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Motivation Phylogenetic profiling is a powerful computational method for revealing the functions of function-unknown genes. Although conventional similarity metrics in phylogenetic profiling achieved high prediction accuracy, they have two estimation biases: an evolutionary bias and a spurious correlation bias. While previous studies reduced the evolutionary bias by considering a phylogenetic tree, few studies have analyzed the spurious correlation bias. Results To reduce the spurious correlation bias, we developed metrics based on the inverse Potts model (IPM) for phylogenetic profiling. We also developed a metric based on both the IPM and a phylogenetic tree. In an empirical dataset analysis, we demonstrated that these IPM-based metrics improved the prediction performance of phylogenetic profiling. In addition, we found that the integration of several metrics, including the IPM-based metrics, had superior performance to a single metric. Availability and implementation The source code is freely available at https://github.com/fukunagatsu/Ipm. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fukunaga et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: