Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Globally, the adoption of COVID-19 containment measures, such as lockdowns, have been used to curb the rapid spread of the pandemic. However, these action regulations have caused substantial challenges to livelihoods. We explored the perceptions and experiences of COVID-19 implications for urban informal food traders in South Africa during the initial lockdown period that lasted five weeks. A rapid qualitative study was conducted during October–November 2020. Twelve key informants (seven men and five women) categorized into informal traders and food system expert groups were interviewed. Data were analyzed thematically using MAXQDA software. Participants perceived informal trading as a main source of livelihood for many individuals. Negative lockdown impacts described included forced business closure, increased food costs and reduced demand. The consensus among participants was that the government’s lack of formal recognition for informal food traders pre-COVID-19 contributed to challenges they faced during the pandemic, as evidenced by their exclusion as “essential service providers’’ at the start of lockdown. Policies that fail to recognize and consider informal food traders during ‘normal’ times lead to widened social inequality gaps among already vulnerable groups during natural disasters and disease outbreaks. In the case of COVID-19 in South Africa, this caused severe hunger, food insecurity and income loss.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Teurai Rwafa-Ponela
University of the Witwatersrand
Susan Goldstein
South African Medical Research Council
Petronell Kruger
South African Medical Research Council
Sustainability
University of the Witwatersrand
South African Medical Research Council
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rwafa-Ponela et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0252a1809925d9aa11a3c4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042294
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: