4D Flow MRI provides comprehensive 3D velocity vector information and retrospective flowmetry advantages over conventional 2D methods, despite current limitations in imaging time and standardization.
This special issue of Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences features the most recent reviews on 4D Flow MRI. These reviews deal with the current status of the emerging technique of 4D Flow MRI facilitated in various areas that are difficult to obtain with conventional flowmetry. MR signals inherently contain flow velocity information. In previous decades, in vivo blood flow measurement was traditionally performed by 2D methods, such as Doppler ultrasonography and 2D phase-contrast MRI, which have long been regarded as mature techniques in hemodynamic flowmetry. Although 2D velocimetries have many advantages over 4D Flow MRI in terms of cost and accessibility, and provide excellent temporal and in-plane spatial resolutions, they also have some disadvantages. The emerging technology of 4D Flow MRI can overcome the shortcomings of conventional 2D imaging. In recent years, hemodynamic analysis has witnessed significant progress that is primarily attributable to advances in 4D Flow MRI.
Takehara et al. (Sat,) conducted a editorial in Cardiovascular disease. 4D Flow MRI vs. 2D phase-contrast MRI was evaluated. 4D Flow MRI provides comprehensive 3D velocity vector information and retrospective flowmetry advantages over conventional 2D methods, despite current limitations in imaging time and standardization.