Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Five years after the last prostatic carcinoma grading consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP), accrual of new data and modification of clinical practice require an update of current pathologic grading guidelines. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of the ISUP consensus meeting for grading of prostatic carcinoma held in September 2019, in Nice, France. Topics brought to consensus included the following: (1) approaches to reporting of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 quantities, and minor/tertiary patterns, (2) an agreement to report the presence of invasive cribriform carcinoma, (3) an agreement to incorporate intraductal carcinoma into grading, and (4) individual versus aggregate grading of systematic and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies. Finally, developments in the field of artificial intelligence in the grading of prostatic carcinoma and future research perspectives were discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geert J.L.H. van Leenders
Erasmus MC
Theodorus van der Kwast
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
David J. Grignon
American College of Radiology
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
University of Chicago
University of California, San Francisco
The University of Queensland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Leenders et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7f7993eff0c9dfaae2e16 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000001497