A fast cellular automata-based simulator performed full ventricular simulations in seconds, successfully emulating biophysical models and reproducing a patient's ventricular tachycardia.
A novel cellular automata-based simulator enables rapid, personalized cardiac electrophysiology simulations that accurately reproduce ventricular tachycardia, potentially facilitating clinical translation for arrhythmia risk assessment.
Personalized cardiac electrophysiology simulations have demonstrated great potential to study cardiac arrhythmias and help in therapy planning of radio-frequency ablation. Its application to analyze vulnerability to ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death in infarcted patients has been recently explored. However, the detailed multi-scale biophysical simulations used in these studies are very demanding in terms of memory and computational resources, which prevents their clinical translation. In this work, we present a fast phenomenological system based on cellular automata (CA) to simulate personalized cardiac electrophysiology. The system is trained on biophysical simulations to reproduce cellular and tissue dynamics in healthy and pathological conditions, including action potential restitution, conduction velocity restitution and cell safety factor. We show that a full ventricular simulation can be performed in the order of seconds, emulate the results of a biophysical simulation and reproduce a patient’s ventricular tachycardia in a model that includes a heterogeneous scar region. The system could be used to study the risk of arrhythmia in infarcted patients for a large number of scenarios.
Serra et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death in infarcted patients. Cellular automata-based cardiac electrophysiology simulator vs. Biophysical simulations was evaluated. A fast cellular automata-based simulator performed full ventricular simulations in seconds, successfully emulating biophysical models and reproducing a patient's ventricular tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: