Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
< .001) than the radiologist specificity of 98.1% (111 196 of 113 303; 95% CI: 98.1, 98.2). The radiologist workload was reduced by 62.6% (71 585 of 114 421), and 25.1% (529 of 2107) of false-positive screenings were avoided. Screening results were consistent across BI-RADS densities, although not significantly so for sensitivity. Conclusion Artificial intelligence (AI)-based screening could detect normal, moderate-risk, and suspicious mammograms in a breast cancer screening program, which may reduce the radiologist workload. AI-based screening performed consistently across breast densities. © RSNA, 2022
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andreas D. Lauritzen
Gentofte Hospital
Alejandro Rodríguez‐Ruiz
Universidad de Sevilla
My von Euler‐Chelpin
University of Copenhagen
Radiology
University of Copenhagen
Radboud University Nijmegen
Radboud University Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lauritzen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01d4448d267ec217d8c291 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.210948