Personalized sequencing and brief durations of cognitive behavioral therapy resulted in similar trajectories of improvement and end-of-study outcomes compared to full standard treatment.
RCT (n=70)
Sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)
Does personalized skill sequencing and duration of CBT improve outcomes in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders?
Personalized durations of CBT may be feasible but do not substantially impact trajectories of change in anxiety or depressive symptoms compared to standard treatment.
Given that over 20 million adults each year do not receive care for their mental health difficulties, it is imperative to improve system-level capacity issues by increasing treatment efficiency. The present study aimed to collect feasibility/acceptability data on two strategies for increasing the efficiency of cognitive behavioral therapy: (1) personalized skill sequences and (2) personalized skill selections. Participants (N = 70) with anxiety and depressive disorders were enrolled in a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART). Patients were randomly assigned to receive skill modules from the Unified Protocol in one of three sequencing conditions: standard, sequences that prioritized patients' relative strengths, and sequences that prioritized relative deficits. Participants also underwent a second-stage randomization to either receive 6 sessions or 12 sessions of treatment. Participants were generally satisfied with the treatment they received, though significant differences favored the Capitalization and Full duration conditions. There were no differences in trajectories of improvement as a function of sequencing condition. There were also no differences in end-of-study outcomes between brief personalized treatment and full standard treatment. Thus, it may be feasible to deliver CBT for personalized durations, though this may not substantially impact trajectories of change in anxiety or depressive symptoms.
Sauer‐Zavala et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Anxiety and depressive disorders (n=70). Personalized skill sequences and selections (Unified Protocol) vs. Standard sequencing and full standard treatment was evaluated on Feasibility, acceptability, and trajectories of improvement. Personalized sequencing and brief durations of cognitive behavioral therapy resulted in similar trajectories of improvement and end-of-study outcomes compared to full standard treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: