Radiofrequency catheter ablation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of esophageal ulcers compared to cryoballoon ablation (19% vs. 0%, p<0.0001).
Observational (n=160)
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation affect the incidence of esophagogastric complications in patients with atrial fibrillation?
While asymptomatic esophagogastric complications are common after atrial fibrillation ablation, radiofrequency ablation is associated with a significantly higher risk of esophageal ulcers compared to cryoballoon ablation.
Absolute Event Rate: 19% vs 0%
p-value: p=<0.0001
INTRODUCTION: Direct comparison studies about the incidence of esophagogastric complications between radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) have been scarce. We sought to elucidate the relationship between the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) modalities and esophagogastric complications. METHODS: The study population consisted of 254 patients who underwent CA for AF from November 2017 to October 2018. Finally, 160 patients were enrolled and divided into the RF and CB groups. Esophageal ulcers, gastric hypomotility, and exfoliative esophagitis detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy were defined as esophagogastric complications in this study. RESULTS: The median age was 68 years old, with 34% being females. Esophagogastric complications were observed in 42.5% of patients who underwent CA. According to the detailed esophagogastric complications, the RF group had a higher prevalence of esophageal ulcers than the CB group (19% vs. 0%, p < .0001). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding gastric hypomotility and exfoliative esophagitis (18% vs. 28%; p = .15 and 16% vs. 21%; p = .42, respectively). CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic esophagogastric complications were common in CA for AF. The incidence of esophageal ulcers was higher in the RF group than in the CB group, whereas the other esophagogastric complications did not significantly differ.
Oikawa et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=160). Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation vs. Cryoballoon (CB) catheter ablation was evaluated on Esophageal ulcers (p=<0.0001). Radiofrequency catheter ablation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of esophageal ulcers compared to cryoballoon ablation (19% vs. 0%, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: