Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Chinese outward investment is increasing in its relevance for the global economy, and its effects on host states are increasingly being scrutinized globally. While European policy-making was ambiguous about the question of hosting Chinese state-led investment (CSLI) in the early 2010s, we can observe a recent surge of protectionist legal measures across Europe. What explains this trend among different European countries? Through the lens of incremental ideational change, we hypothesize that the rise of China as a global investor shifts the perceptions of policy-makers away from being a source of investment toward a potential threat to national security. We argue that this China effect affects advanced European economies similarly. We provide evidence by studying the shift in perceptions among policy-makers in a coordinated and a liberal market economy, Germany and the UK. By drawing on document analysis and expert interviews, we unpack the policy processes in both countries in the last decade. Despite being two dissimilar cases, both show a similar outcome in increasingly curbing CSLI on the grounds of national security reasons. Our results add important insights to recent International Political Economy discussions on the “geopoliticization” of European trade and investment rules in the face of a rising China.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Milan Babić
University of Amsterdam
Adam D. Dixon
Kettering General Hospital
The Chinese Journal of International Politics
Maastricht University
Roskilde University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Babić et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0da9341e1a6dfdb4bab924 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac009
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: