Assessment of flow-mediated dilatation using the cuff method yielded higher values than ultrasound (121.6% vs 8.1% in healthy subjects; 55.2% vs 4.5% in hypertensive patients).
Observational (n=51)
Endothelial dysfunction has been shown to be an important risk factor in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, hypertension, and heart failure. The flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the peripheral arteries is an endothelium-dependent function, which is assessed by measuring the diameter change in the brachial artery before and after ischemic stress. Brachial-artery ultrasound scanning (BAUS) is the gold standard for assessing the FMD in clinical practice. However, ultrasonography requires an operator or physician with a professional training to perform accurate measurement of the diameter of the brachial artery. Thus, some studies have used the cuff method to measure the FMD in percentage, the value of which is significantly larger than that using BAUS. The goal of this study was to explore this phenomenon. We explain the interaction between the volume changes (oscillation magnitudes in volume due to cardiac pulsations) of the artery and cuff bladder under different transmural pressures when a sphygmomanometer is wrapped around an upper arm. The compliance of the cuff bladder would be of a fixed value when the cuff pressure is low. The cuff-volume change could be replaced with a cuff-pressure change (oscillation magnitude in cuff pressure due to cardiac pulsation). With the cuff method, the FMDc could be assessed with pressure changes. Then, an inequality formula regarding FMD values by both BAUS (FMDu) and the cuff method (FMDc) was derived; FMDc > 2*FMDu + FMDu2. In order to experimentally verify this inequality formula, fifty-one subjects, including thirty-eight healthy adults and thirteen patients with hypertension, participated in this study. The systolic and diastolic diameters of their brachial arteries and cuff-pressure changes due to cardiac pulsations were separately measured by BAUS and a pressure sensor before and after an ischemic stress. The results showed that FMDu and FMDc were 8.1 ± 4.3% and 121.6 ± 48.6% in the healthy group and 4.5 ± 1.1% and 55.2 ± 22.8% in the patient group, respectively. Thus, the experimental findings comply with the theoretically derived inequality formula.
Wang et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Healthy adults and hypertension (n=51). Cuff method vs. Brachial-artery ultrasound scanning (BAUS) was evaluated on Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). Assessment of flow-mediated dilatation using the cuff method yielded higher values than ultrasound (121.6% vs 8.1% in healthy subjects; 55.2% vs 4.5% in hypertensive patients).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: