Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Eye movements, eye blinks, cardiac signals, muscle noise, and line noise present serious problems for electroencephalographic (EEG) interpretation and analysis when rejecting contaminated EEG segments results in an unacceptable data loss. Many methods have been proposed to remove artifacts from EEG recordings, especially those arising from eye movements and blinks. Often regression in the time or frequency domain is performed on parallel EEG and electrooculographic (EOG) recordings to derive parameters characterizing the appearance and spread of EOG artifacts in the EEG channels. Because EEG and ocular activity mix bidirectionally, regressing out eye artifacts inevitably involves subtracting relevant EEG signals from each record as well. Regression methods become even more problematic when a good regressing channel is not available for each artifact source, as in the case of muscle artifacts. Use of principal component analysis (PCA) has been proposed to remove eye artifacts from multichannel EEG. However, PCA cannot completely separate eye artifacts from brain signals, especially when they have comparable amplitudes. Here, we propose a new and generally applicable method for removing a wide variety of artifacts from EEG records based on blind source separation by independent component analysis (ICA). Our results on EEG data collected from normal and autistic subjects show that ICA can effectively detect, separate, and remove contamination from a wide variety of artifactual sources in EEG records with results comparing favorably with those obtained using regression and PCA methods. ICA can also be used to analyze blink-related brain activity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tzyy‐Ping Jung
University of California, San Diego
Scott Makeig
Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Colin Humphries
Moog (United States)
Psychophysiology
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
University of California, San Diego
Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jung et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a100044fa36b6e053fd1fd0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577200980259