Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Deliberation, which has become a democratic standard in American political settings, has also an undemocratic appeal. Foremost among the undemocratic charges against deliberation is that its proponents cannot guarantee equality of opportunity to those who want to participate in it. Furthermore, critics of deliberation argue that the problem of ordinary citizens committing excesses when they participate in deliberative processes must be addressed. The advantages and disadvantages of deliberation are evaluated and an alternative model for democratic politics is proposed. © COPYRIGHT 1997 Sage Publications Inc. Admittedly, opposing deliberation seems irrational.(1) A commitment to deliberation is, after all, a commitment to finding a way to address concerns, resolve disagreements, and overcome conflicts by offering arguments supported by reasons to our fellow citizens. Deliberative democracy promises legitimate--that is, morally justifiable and rationally produced--solutions to vexing political problems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lynn M. Sanders (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f101f233f77a0d6b7753cd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002
Lynn M. Sanders
Political Theory
University of Chicago
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: