A combination of three clinical variables identified a very-low-risk group of 48 patients (8%) with chest pain in whom ECGs did not add diagnostic accuracy.
Observational (n=596)
596 patients presenting to an emergency room with chest pain.
Clinical and laboratory variables (history, physical examination, ECG)
Identification of low-risk patients for myocardial infarction or unstable angina
• Clinical and laboratory data from 596 patients who came to an emergency room complaining of chest pain indicated that no single variable could identify low-risk patients as well as a normal ECG. A combination of three variables—sharp or stabbing pain, no history of angina or myocardial infarction, and pain with pleuritic or positional components or pain that was reproduced by palpation of the chest wall—defined a very-low-risk group in which ECGs did not add accuracy to the evaluation and were potentially misleading; however, only 48 patients (8%) fell into this category. Standard cardiac enzyme levels were of almost no use as an emergency room indicator of myocardial infarction. These findings emphasize the difficulty of identifying patients at low risk for myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the emergency room without consideration of many factors from the history, the physical examination, and the ECG. (Arch Intern Med1985;145:65-69)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
T. H. Lee
Archives of Internal Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
T. H. Lee (Tue,) conducted a observational in Chest pain (n=596). Clinical and laboratory variables (history, physical examination, ECG) was evaluated on Identification of low-risk patients for myocardial infarction or unstable angina. A combination of three clinical variables identified a very-low-risk group of 48 patients (8%) with chest pain in whom ECGs did not add diagnostic accuracy.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21ba8329a2272c3e11a532 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.145.1.65
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: