Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective To investigate the differences in delivery mode, daily dose, and catheter tip location in pediatric patients using intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps with spasticity plus dystonia versus spasticity alone. Methods A single-center, cross-sectional study was performed by collecting retrospective data from electronic medical records. Demographic and diagnostic information was obtained, comparing patients with spasticity with or without dystonia. The data were analyzed for group differences using a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Categorical data were analyzed for group differences using Pearson’s χ 2 test. Results A total of 137 patients met the criteria. The majority (114) had spasticity plus dystonia whereas only 23 were documented as spasticity alone. Simple continuous dosing was the most common delivery mode, but flex dosing was used more than twice as frequently with spasticity plus dystonia compared with spasticity alone (42% vs 17%). Patients with spasticity plus dystonia also had more rostral catheter tip locations. Conclusions While it has been discussed anecdotally, this study confirms the supposition that patients with spasticity plus dystonia have increased dose requirements when compared with those with spasticity alone. Although there are no clear standards of care when managing these patients, they are often on higher daily dosages, are more likely to require flexed dosing method, and have higher catheter placements. Still, there are few studies that demonstrate improvements in dystonia with the use of ITB. In general, these patients would benefit from the development of universal standardizations as well as the confirmation that this is an appropriate treatment.
Gober et al. (Sun,) studied this question.