Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The findings of this cohort study suggest that there were few differences in risk of adverse events within 14 days of the first dose of either the BNT162b2 or the mRNA-1273 vaccine and small-magnitude differences within 42 days of the first dose. The 38-week risks of adverse events were low in both vaccine groups, although risks were lower for recipients of the mRNA-1273 vaccine than for recipients of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Although the primary analysis was designed to detect safety events unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the possibility that these differences may partially be explained by a lower effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing the sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the mRNA-1273 vaccine could not be ruled out. These findings may help inform decision-making in future vaccination campaigns.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Barbra A. Dickerman
Harvard University
Arin L. Madenci
Boston Children's Hospital
Hanna Gerlovin
Boston University
JAMA Internal Medicine
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dickerman et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5700275589c71d767db44 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2109
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: