Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
INTRODUCTION: The multiple bar approach was developed to cover broader and heavier teenager/adult chest wall deformities. We designed the cross-bar technique to achieve remodeling of the entire chest wall. This study aimed to demonstrate the role of cross-bar and its benefits over the parallel bar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cross-bar technique involves placing two bars diagonally and then cross on the target. The primary purposes are to double the lifting forces by making two bars converge on a single target to lift inflexible heavy chest wall depressions or cover lower lateral areas. The results of the cross-bar and parallel bar are compared for the indications, postrepair outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: = 1.0), although the cross-bar group was more rigid and complex. There was no bar displacement or reoperation in both groups. CONCLUSION: The cross-bar technique is as safe and effective as the parallel-bar technique, even though it was selected to correct more complexities. The cross-bar technique could be a method for complex PE deformities for remodeling of the entire chest wall.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kwanyong Hyun
Hyung Joo Park
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Catholic University of Korea
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hyun et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0330e31abe013fb89e3df1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1897-7202
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: