Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Treatment with ionising radiation is a valuable component of treatment schedules for a many children and young people with cancer. While some form of radiotherapy has been in use for over 100 years, a series of innovations has revolutionised paediatric radiation oncology. Mostly, high-energy X-ray photons are used, but proton beam radiotherapy is increasingly offered, especially in children and young people. This is to reduce the radiation exposure of healthy normal tissues and so the likelihood of adverse effects. Other methods of radiotherapy delivery include brachytherapy and molecular radiotherapy. The most appropriate treatment technique should be selected for every child. Advances in computers and imaging, developments in the technology of radiation delivery and a better understanding of pathology and molecular biology of cancer, coupled with parallel improvements in surgery and systemic therapy, have led to a transformation of practice in recent decades. Initially an empirical art form, radiotherapy for children has become a technically advanced, evidence-based cornerstone of increasingly personalised cancer medicine with solid scientific foundations. Late sequelae of treatment-the adverse effects once accepted as the cost of cure-have been significantly reduced in parallel with increased survival rates. The delivery of radiotherapy to children and young people requires a specialised multiprofessional team including radiation oncologists, therapeutic radiographers, play specialists and physicists among others. This article reviews the types of radiotherapy now available and outlines the pathway of the child through treatment. It aims to demonstrate to paediatricians how contemporary paediatric radiation oncology differs from past practice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tom Boterberg
Ghent University Hospital
Cathy Dunlea
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Semi Harrabi
Heidelberg University
Archives of Disease in Childhood
University College London
Heidelberg University
University Medical Center Utrecht
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Boterberg et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd1e90bc2a1a5f64e52d84 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2021-323059
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: