Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Infarct volume (FIV) on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (FU-DWI) is only moderately associated with functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. However, FU-DWI may contain other imaging biomarkers that could aid in improving outcome prediction models for acute ischemic stroke. We included FU-DWI data from the HERMES, ISLES, and MR CLEAN-NO IV databases. Lesions were segmented using a deep learning model trained on the HERMES and ISLES datasets. We assessed the performance of three classifiers in predicting functional independence for the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial cohort based on: (1) FIV alone, (2) the most important features obtained from a trained convolutional autoencoder (CAE), and (3) radiomics. Furthermore, we investigated feature importance in the radiomic-feature-based model. For outcome prediction, we included 206 patients: 144 scans were included in the training set, 21 in the validation set, and 41 in the test set. The classifiers that included the CAE and the radiomic features showed AUC values of 0.88 and 0.81, respectively, while the model based on FIV had an AUC of 0.79. This difference was not found to be statistically significant. Feature importance results showed that lesion intensity heterogeneity received more weight than lesion volume in outcome prediction. This study suggests that predictions of functional outcome should not be based on FIV alone and that FU-DWI images capture additional prognostic information.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Manon L. Tolhuisen
Amsterdam University College
Jan W. Hoving
Amsterdam Neuroscience
Miou S. Koopman
Defense Information Systems Agency
Diagnostics
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
University of California, Los Angeles
Inserm
The University of Melbourne
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tolhuisen et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f965a6c999c7ff5e444c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081786
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: