Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome and the associated factors of a treatment protocol for peri-implant mucositis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were evaluated 30 months after a treatment protocol including professional mechanical debridement and modification of the prosthesis contours to improve access for biofilm control. Clinical performance was assessed by means of probing with an electronic pressure-calibrated periodontal probe. The possible impact of implant- and patient-level factors on the changes in peri-implant mucosal inflammation measured with the modified bleeding index (mBI) was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty patients and 61 implants were included in the analysis. At the final visit, 50% of the patients presented bleeding on probing, with a mean mBI of 0.22 (SD 0.27). The adjusted linear regression model showed a significant association between patient's compliance with supportive care visits (p = .006) and mucosal inflammation. Similarly, at the implant level, modified plaque index (p < .001) and an irregular use of interdental brushes (p = .017) had a significant impact on final mBI. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis modification when needed in association with non-surgical treatment may be an important intervention in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. Compliance with supportive care visits and the regular use of inter-dental brushes were identified as important factors to achieve mucosal inflammation control.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Beatriz de Tapia
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Maria Bonnin
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Cristina Vallés
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tapia et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0fe983b6f5ee0401601630 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13711