Severe aortic stenosis was associated with higher absolute resting coronary flow (p=0.009) and significantly impaired coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance reserve (p<0.005).
Case-Control (n=58)
Does severe aortic stenosis alter absolute coronary flow, microvascular resistance, CFR, and MRR compared to matched controls?
In patients with severe aortic stenosis, increased resting coronary flow compensates for LV hypertrophy but leads to impaired coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance reserve during hyperemia.
p-value: p=<0.005
Background Development of left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy in aortic stenosis (AS) is accompanied by adaptive coronary flow regulation. We aimed to assess absolute coronary flow, microvascular resistance, coronary flow reverse (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) in patients with and without AS. Methods Absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance were measured by continuous thermodilution in 29 patients with AS and 29 controls, without AS, matched for age, gender, diabetes and functional severity of epicardial coronary lesions. Myocardial work, total myocardial mass and left anterior descending artery (LAD)-specific mass were quantified by echocardiography and cardiac-CT. Results Patients with AS presented a significantly positive LV remodelling with lower global longitudinal strain and global work efficacy compared with controls. Total LV myocardial mass and LAD-specific myocardial mass were significantly higher in patients with AS (p=0.001). Compared with matched controls, absolute resting flow in the LAD was significantly higher in the AS cohort (p=0.009), resulting into lower CFR and MRR in the AS cohort compared with controls (p < 0.005 for both). No differences were found in hyperaemic flow and resting and hyperaemic resistances. Hyperaemic myocardial perfusion (calculated as the ratio between the absolute coronary flow subtended to the LAD, expressed in mL/min/g), but not resting, was significantly lower in the AS group (p=0.035). Conclusions In patients with severe AS and non-obstructive coronary artery disease, with the progression of LV hypertrophy, the compensatory mechanism of increased resting flow maintains adequate perfusion at rest, but not during hyperaemia. As a consequence, both CFR and MRR are significantly impaired.
Paolisso et al. (Wed,) conducted a case-control in Severe aortic stenosis (n=58). Severe aortic stenosis vs. Controls without AS was evaluated on Absolute coronary flow, microvascular resistance, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) (p=<0.005). Severe aortic stenosis was associated with higher absolute resting coronary flow (p=0.009) and significantly impaired coronary flow reserve and microvascular resistance reserve (p<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: