Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This contribution makes the case for a shift in boundaries between the (populist) radical right and the extreme right, arguing for the systematic use of the term ‘far right’. The significance of a deliberately generic but fundamentally meaningful concept such as ‘far right’ is motivated by the growing links between illiberal‐democratic (‘radical right’) and anti‐democratic (‘extreme right’) collective actors. This begs considering the conceptual grounds for differentiation among far‐right collective actors, their underlying dynamics, and why it is important to look at what they do to tackle this phenomenon in practice—that is, to extrapolate their ideological essence and their varying allegiances to democracy. The complexity of far‐right politics questions the long‐standing conceptual distinctions internally defining it. The use of an umbrella concept may thus enhance precision in the discussion of this phenomenon, at the same time highlighting the unfolding of a new phase in nativist politics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrea L. P. Pirro
University of Bologna
Nations and Nationalism
Scuola Normale Superiore
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrea L. P. Pirro (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69de73b67ed287395e558e19 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12860
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: