Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Patients recently hospitalized for heart failure (HF) are at high risk for rehospitalization and death. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes and response to dapagliflozin in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who were enrolled during or following hospitalization. METHODS: The DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVES of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trial randomized patients with HF and LVEF >40% to dapagliflozin or placebo. DELIVER permitted randomization during or shortly after hospitalization for HF in clinically stable patients off intravenous HF therapies. This prespecified analysis investigated whether recent HF hospitalization modified risk of clinical events or response to dapagliflozin. The primary outcome was worsening HF event or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: = 0.71). Rates of adverse events, including volume depletion, diabetic ketoacidosis, or renal events, were similar with dapagliflozin and placebo in recently hospitalized patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin safely reduced risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death similarly in patients with and without history of recent HF hospitalization. Starting dapagliflozin during or shortly after HF hospitalization in patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF appears safe and effective. (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVEs of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure DELIVER; NCT03619213).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonathan W. Cunningham
Muthiah Vaduganathan
Brian Claggett
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Harvard University
Yale University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cunningham et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69f690ffe405cc4465bc2a12 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.021
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: