A hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system significantly improved metrics of neurotypical brain development, including greater reductions in cortical surface area (d=0.74), compared to standard care over 6 months in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
RCT (n=44)
50:50 assignment ratio without stratification
Single-blind (assessor-blinded)
Yes
Type 1 diabetes (n=44)
Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system (Medtronic MiniMed 670G) vs Standard diabetes care (MDI or open-loop pump)
Change in total cortical surface area (cm2) — Cohen's d 0.74 (-13.47, -1.27), p=0.018
Effect estimate: Cohen's d 0.74 (95% CI -13.47, -1.27)
Absolute Event Rate: -12.56% vs -5.19%
p-value: p=0.018
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with lower scores on tests of cognitive and neuropsychological function and alterations in brain structure and function in children. This proof-of-concept pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03428932) examined whether MRI-derived indices of brain development and function and standardized IQ scores in adolescents with T1D could be improved with better diabetes control using a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system. Eligibility criteria for participation in the study included age between 14 and 17 years and a diagnosis of T1D before 8 years of age. Randomization to either a hybrid closed-loop or standard diabetes care group was performed after pre-qualification, consent, enrollment, and collection of medical background information. Of 46 participants assessed for eligibility, 44 met criteria and were randomized. Two randomized participants failed to complete baseline assessments and were excluded from final analyses. Participant data were collected across five academic medical centers in the United States. Research staff scoring the cognitive assessments as well as those processing imaging data were blinded to group status though participants and their families were not. Forty-two adolescents, 21 per group, underwent cognitive assessment and multi-modal brain imaging before and after the six month study duration. HbA1c and sensor glucose downloads were obtained quarterly. Primary outcomes included metrics of gray matter (total and regional volumes, cortical surface area and thickness), white matter volume, and fractional anisotropy. Estimated power to detect the predicted treatment effect was 0.83 with two-tailed, α = 0.05. Adolescents in the hybrid closed-loop group showed significantly greater improvement in several primary outcomes indicative of neurotypical development during adolescence compared to the standard care group including cortical surface area, regional gray volumes, and fractional anisotropy. The two groups were not significantly different on total gray and white matter volumes or cortical thickness. The hybrid closed loop group also showed higher Perceptual Reasoning Index IQ scores and functional brain activity more indicative of neurotypical development relative to the standard care group (both secondary outcomes). No adverse effects associated with study participation were observed. These results suggest that alterations to the developing brain in T1D might be preventable or reversible with rigorous glucose control. Long term research in this area is needed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Allan L. Reiss
University of Geneva
Booil Jo
Stanford University
Ana María Arbeláez
Washington University in St. Louis
Nature Communications
Stanford University
Yale University
Washington University in St. Louis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Reiss et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Type 1 diabetes (n=44). Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system (Medtronic MiniMed 670G) vs. Standard diabetes care (MDI or open-loop pump) was evaluated on Change in total cortical surface area (cm2) (Cohen's d 0.74, 95% CI -13.47, -1.27, p=0.018). A hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system significantly improved metrics of neurotypical brain development, including greater reductions in cortical surface area (d=0.74), compared to standard care over 6 months in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d5aae73c56dd1bd2f9172 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32289-x