Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Wound repair is a systematic biological program characterized by four overlapping phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Notwithstanding differences between species and distinct anatomical sites, the fundamental phases in the wound healing process are conserved among mammalian species. Oral wound healing is defined as an ideal wound healing model because it resolves rapidly and without scar formation. Understanding the regulation and contribution of the different molecular events that drive rapid wound healing in oral mucosa compared with those of the skin will help us define how these lesions heal more efficiently and may provide new therapeutic strategies that can be translated to the clinical settings for patients with chronic nonhealing wounds. Although all epithelial tissues have remarkable ability for tissue repair, the efficiency of such repair differs between epithelia (oral mucosa vs. cutaneous). This prompts the long-standing, fundamental biological and clinically relevant questions as to why and how does the oral mucosa achieve its enhanced wound healing capacity. In this review, we focus on (1) distinct innate wound healing capabilities of the oral mucosa, (2) lessons learned from comparative transcriptomic studies of oral mucosa versus skin, and (3) translation of findings to therapeutics for enhanced wound healing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrew M. Overmiller
National Institutes of Health
Andrew P. Sawaya
University of Miami
Emma Hope
Essex Cardiothoracic Centre
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Overmiller et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01d2ae897643a80dcb0ffe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041244
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: