Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy

ACG: American College of Gastroenterology; ADR: adenoma detection rate; APC: adenoma per colonoscopy; ASGE: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; CRC: colorectal cancer; PDR: polyp detection rate Colonoscopy is widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of colon disorders. Properly performed, colonoscopy is generally safe, accurate, and well-tolerated. Visualization of the mucosa of the entire large intestine and distal terminal ileum usually is possible during colonoscopy. Polyps can be removed during colonoscopy, thereby reducing the risk of colon cancer. Colonoscopy is the preferred method to evaluate the colon in most adult patients with large-bowel symptoms, iron deficiency anemia, abnormal results on radiographic studies of the colon, positive results on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance, and diagnosis and surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. In addition, colonoscopy is the most commonly used CRC screening test in the United States (1). Based on 2010 data, over 3.3 million outpatient colonoscopies are performed annually in the United States, with screening and polyp surveillance accounting for half of indications (2). Optimal effectiveness of colonoscopy depends on patient acceptance of the procedure, which depends mostly on acceptance of the bowel preparation (3). Preparation quality affects the completeness of examination, procedure duration, and the need to cancel or repeat procedures at earlier dates than would otherwise be needed (4, 5). Ineffective preparation is a major contributor to costs (6). Meticulous inspection (7, 8) and longer withdrawal times (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) are associated with higher adenoma detection rates (ADR). A high ADR is essential to rendering recommended intervals (15) between screening and surveillance examinations safe (16, 17). Optimal technique is needed to ensure a high probability of detecting dysplasia when present in inflammatory bowel disease (17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Finally, technical expertise and experience will help prevent adverse events that might offset the benefits of removing neoplastic lesions (22). Recent studies report that colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancer and cancer deaths (ie, colon cancer proximal to the splenic flexure) compared with distal cancer (ie, colon cancer at or distal to the splenic flexure) (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Decreased protection against right-sided CRC is likely due to multiple factors. These include missed adenomas or incompletely resected adenomas; suboptimal bowel preparation; precancerous lesions that are endoscopically subtle or difficult to remove, such as sessile serrated polyps and flat and/or depressed adenomas, and differences in tumorigenesis between right-sided and left-sided cancers. Improving prevention of right-sided colon cancer is a major goal of colonoscopy quality programs. Five studies have established that gastroenterologists are more effective than surgeons or primary care physicians at preventing CRC colonoscopy most likely higher rates of examinations (ie, and higher rates of adenoma detection gastroenterologists colonoscopy the quality of colonoscopy. multiple are to in the and recommended quality quality of care can be the of or a of with or that is used for is a quality A quality is as a between the of and the for or as the of that a goal can be of the entire care a or in that quality during the of care ADR and during colonoscopy for the results of the care that the prevention of cancer colonoscopy and in the of In the American Society for Gastrointestinal College of on in of quality for colonoscopy present to quality and quality for colonoscopy that associated with in and and in studies studies a of of the of such studies of a is that of would a of quality is is a might be widely used for quality or quality in the on to the quality of care to patients is to the in which is performed, of quality in the of quality on the of the quality as or a quality are can be difficult to in need of large of and and be factors. In such the to as of of a on the that with a and such of quality for in a that to be as quality and a of for quality in the when to a when to a quality a such as during the as is to that the the of care as to quality and In to quality the recommended a of the on and that in and of of the of procedures needed to with intervals and the of A for is to with to would to quality the are recommended or the or and of that quality are to such are in in a to the in and to are in will be in as the to be to to of quality to procedures quality between of the and the patient the of or of the for procedures during risk of a of and and of the procedure quality to of colonoscopy include the with which colonoscopy is performed for that is in a of and the is of of indications for colonoscopy be for procedure, and when is a be in the colonoscopy for CRC screening or colon polyp surveillance, the patient a colonoscopy of the colonoscopy that the of that procedure is and polyps removed during that indications for colonoscopy In the indications for procedures a of and have that when colonoscopy is for more are In which indications and and at to as is likely that can be to a rate on the of Gastrointestinal is a for the of colonoscopy goal is to the of procedures with which is of associated with colonoscopy, and of of In to the associated with the the and adverse events to colonoscopy with be the procedure the patient or as or per of the include a of the and to the most of colonoscopy include adverse missed and adverse with which colonoscopies recommended post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection surveillance intervals and intervals between screening colonoscopies in patients have results and bowel of of colonoscopy to be effective and and to the intervals between examinations be between examinations can be effective in prevention of CRC when the colon is of and effective of the colon, as in the is to the effectiveness and of recommended intervals between colonoscopy. recommended intervals bowel and In the risk for CRC or have with CRC and that cancer at screening is recommended in and at intervals A that a screening colonoscopy associated with of protection against colorectal cancer In of colonoscopy with a a repeat colonoscopy a studies of a of with and and longer of protection colonoscopy is is These the American screening colonoscopy at intervals in is patients to and be colonoscopy for CRC for the patient a colonoscopy, of the colonoscopy, and polyps removed during that colonoscopy that is that colonoscopy for CRC screening or colon polyp surveillance is performed at that post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in the United States is performed at intervals that are than recommended in that of is and of is to for of colonoscopy. of of surveillance in patients and in patients of colonoscopy of colonoscopy for screening and post-polypectomy surveillance physicians These the of intervals between examinations in quality programs. more likely to intervals than gastroenterologists the need for colonoscopy to in quality programs. care and physicians can surveillance to post-polypectomy surveillance or to be the recommended the between examinations are recommended on the and experience that a between the of colonoscopy with the and of colonoscopy. are the and of precancerous lesions with sessile polyps in that are removed have a high risk for polyp at the and at to (15) and a a to a of polyp at the post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for sessile serrated polyps sessile serrated and serrated adenomas are on and will be to as lesions include sessile serrated and serrated the sessile serrated are the of a of that in the proximal post-polypectomy surveillance intervals for sessile serrated polyps are to recommended intervals for adenomas and are on and of lesions lesions of be to patients the for serrated as for which colonoscopy is recommended at to intervals have colon a colonoscopy repeat examinations at intervals than the of for the a colonoscopy is the positive of during that is of for in as to colonoscopy is performed for screening or surveillance at intervals than recommended in and for the be to have with which and surveillance is recommended intervals of of In and surveillance to examinations in patients with disease have in which dysplasia is used when patients are are colonoscopy on the of disease. to examinations or examinations in patients to and of are associated with risk of colorectal cancer colonoscopy is recommended to the of when the or in disease when more than of the colon is are to the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy in or studies in a for patients in surveillance of in the United States and the United that are with surveillance have a of and in to of dysplasia surveillance colonoscopy, which as a of care in the United of disease is to be the of for the of surveillance for and the of dysplasia or cancer during surveillance is and is to of surveillance colonoscopy during the between and of intervals of to are generally the of primary and a colon that is studies to that the risk for CRC in in intervals between examinations are for patients with disease and be earlier in the of disease in patients with established risk such as a of CRC or a of primary with primary are to have surveillance at the is with endoscopically abnormal or are at risk for of compared with patients with endoscopically patients with endoscopically or with can be to longer intervals of surveillance of at to at during the to the of symptoms, and the of primary physicians to recommended for screening and surveillance missed of will to serrated lesions in the proximal colon are are intervals for of sessile serrated polyps and large the of splenic during colonoscopy in the is the of surveillance for and will with recommended surveillance and surveillance be for with the of adenomas surveillance for with high quality of the colon of of the entire colon and a and costs the need for radiographic procedures or repeat colonoscopy to the inspection is essential to effective CRC prevention and of cancer detection of neoplastic lesions is the primary goal of most of colonoscopy for the detection of neoplastic lesions are rates per of adverse repeat and for endoscopically polyps can is on to evaluate and possible to the costs associated with the of or of the when is to the of the the technical of the procedure of the and of to most procedures is the of and need for patient quality to of colonoscopy include the with which the procedure the quality of preparation of of of bowel preparation is on to the mucosa and have the quality of the bowel preparation in colonoscopy commonly used to bowel preparation include and In have are in of bowel preparation which is of to the can be the or that the be detection of the technical of the polyps in is to preparation such as the Preparation or the Preparation the that can be removed of the the quality of bowel preparation on to polyps or bowel is to polyps in and the procedure is performed for CRC screening or colon polyp surveillance, the procedure be in or less preparation the that the recommended the colonoscopy will be with bowel preparation is a major to the effectiveness of colonoscopy. preparation and withdrawal and detection of and large (4, In colonoscopies be at intervals than recommended on of examinations of bowel preparation is (6). with which the bowel preparation is to the of recommended surveillance or screening intervals of of outpatient examinations of that the of outpatient examinations with bowel preparation that repeat colonoscopy in of of examinations of preparation is have of examinations with bowel preparation bowel preparation patient of and for the of the Recent of have effectiveness than that rates of preparation are in preparation and in patient the colonoscopy to of most of preparation quality is the between the of the preparation and the of the procedure as the and the of the colon is that patients be of bowel that half the preparation is on the of the the entire preparation can be on the of to of the American Society of patients have for of that be for for and is studies that that of in the is and patients the bowel preparation or of the bowel preparation on the the procedure patients with longer intervals be in with such as or risk of of with that might be more to or in with or disease in a might be to the half of to procedure and be with at that the quality of preparation as the patients in the to to the can of the half of the preparation on the and preparation is with which of the of and of is in procedure of rate with rate with of In the United States, colonoscopy is with the to the is as of the to a proximal to the that the entire the of the between the and is need for is on the that a of colorectal are in the proximal colon, the rates have associated with higher rates of proximal colon cancer of are be the include the and the in which is as to the of the of the (ie, the or of the terminal ileum will be can in in of is of the with can be to such as the or of the terminal of the is of the be in of in the be or have a is in a of and of rates of in the quality of the to are of the a that the is the and a of the distal to the of the terminal ileum are and are less likely to be effective compared with the of the is in at the of the is in and of the can be a effective of for rates of be to the in of and of when the is screening in a Colonoscopy studies in screening patients in the United States, and at times the United States, have rates of or higher in which procedures are of preparation or need be in that is to the to the is to in which the of the procedure is treatment of a or or a large polyp in the colon distal to the that colon method performed in which a or is be with which adenomas are in of ADR for for of of of detection to adenomas in colonoscopy studies and in studies that used Colonoscopy to prevent CRC in colonoscopy for to the procedure (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, with most of the to missed lesions and as as in and rates is of in the detection of adenomas the for the of for adenoma in and the in for detection the of patients screening colonoscopy or more adenomas as the adenoma detection rate or ADR recommended for ADR on screening colonoscopy studies and at the detection rates of adenomas in studies the that or more adenomas in at of and of screening colonoscopy to the of adenomas and the of adenomas studies and during and a that the to to prevent cancer are with In a of screening colonoscopy for the that patients colonoscopy physicians with for of times higher than patients of physicians with to that cancer protection to when that physicians with high rates patients right-sided cancer than physicians with rates Recent studies report that are higher than the and in that These that the ADR for a might have that the results in cancer prevention or detection of lesions the of ADR in patients colonoscopies examinations for or colonoscopy with the care or with of the gastroenterologists to and in for patients cancers. for cancer in the ADR to and per of of physicians in the ADR risk of cancer of compared with patients of physicians in the ADR a in CRC and a in cancer for in associated with a risk of proximal and distal cancer and risk in and Based on the a for ADR in a screening of at colonoscopy for or patients in or with patient ADR of is recommended for and for Colonoscopy to for and patients in a of screening patients that are at the of in are in have and with to of ADR needed to CRC be a of be used as in the quality that adenoma are and are for in the recommended be in patients and are for and on adenoma include and of the ADR for of is ADR is the primary of the quality of inspection and the most quality in colonoscopy. is a between ADR and recommended intervals for screening and surveillance, that patient be of ADR and to recommended with high and patients at intervals the recommended intervals are when precancerous lesions are with to patients with precancerous lesions and patients with multiple patients at risk for cancer to the colon and intervals between the essential of the ADR of to ensure patient protection ADR is the of the quality of inspection with to of of and to of the detection of precancerous lesions and ADR of in most which for the or A is that a and to polyp with the of the the mucosa as In and results that for of the of to ADR have and polyp detection rate is the of patients with polyp removed during screening colonoscopy in patients the of of and with ADR in studies rates for to ADR have A a between rates and cancer protection to ADR when used in quality be to in that of the of colorectal polyps to have a risk of cancer (ie, distal colon can be or the colonoscopy. the of of studies of are and to studies are performed, is as a quality to be used of A that is the adenoma per colonoscopy which is commonly used in of detection inspection over the entire of the colon than ADR and between might to costs or to polyp in a to be of to detection of multiple the of and is to be the most to and is recommended to and to ensure that to In the ADR be on of adenoma for adenomas of adenoma for right-sided left-sided or polyp of for serrated lesions for ADR established studies detection of adenomas and to serrated lesions the is a sessile serrated is of lesions have These lesions are in a adenomas and be the Recent that is more between of the in detection of lesions than is for adenomas that polyps is a for lesions than is for for the that missed serrated lesions are is the that are more likely to be and in the proximal colon be a detection for serrated lesions is the of with a of for serrated lesions sessile serrated in the proximal colon A be needed ADR and proximal colon serrated detection are the would need to be for proximal serrated lesions distal colon lesions is A proximal colon would be to with and of would be sessile serrated the between sessile serrated polyp and polyp is to in sessile serrated polyps as a detection Finally, ADR and have to with colon cancer for to of the quality of inspection have to for to polyp and and that would the of polyps on and and of the lesions to for a would as the of the polyp and the of goal of most colonoscopies is the detection and prevention of ADR is of the that with CRC and effective prevention of CRC (16, is with higher are more likely to be when patients as In addition, adenoma detection and resection prevent CRC and CRC CRC prevention is and effective polyp detection or resection are established as the which colonoscopy ADR is with which withdrawal is of of withdrawal in screening colonoscopies of of be in colonoscopy with the a withdrawal in screening have detection of neoplastic lesions in examinations in which the withdrawal is that withdrawal be in colonoscopies performed for CRC screening in patients with withdrawal is to ADR as a quality withdrawal times to with be essential or primary of withdrawal be in of with which are of in associated with between longer withdrawal and higher detection rates (7, 10, 11, 12, 13, of the colon which is studies between and withdrawal and technique is likely to be withdrawal that the withdrawal of colonoscopy in patients and in or are performed, on of the that the of to is in and in a colon of and can be in is be that the to a cancer and of colonoscopy. with which are when colonoscopy is performed for of of of with and have mucosa at colonoscopy. diagnosis of otherwise patients colonoscopy for the of have and of is are of the proximal colon the for (17, of recommended when colonoscopy is performed for surveillance in and of of of with or per of colon in of of the colon and terminal ileum can in the of and disease and in disease. Recent have established that with results in and of dysplasia 20, 21). a can be used recommended in of the colon, which results in to procedure report in surveillance examinations the and of flat mucosa and the and of or lesions that for or with which of polyps and sessile polyps is of of polyps and sessile polyps in be for resection at resection or of be to and of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy for repeat colonoscopy and is the of difficult polyps to more for resection is In polyps in have for resection such are endoscopically in of sessile polyps in for resection is In polyps be difficult to or for and to more be of polyps or and in such polyps to for a of or sessile polyps in are on the colon, and the to endoscopically resection is more effective and than resection to is for resection of a large sessile the resection of of the polyp such a resection will in a that can the at resection more polyps can be removed polyps for resection be to the need for resection in the quality of a more can be to ensure the of is of and and of polyp be to the of and lesions for resection that are in that can be with the and proximal colon the is endoscopically and the be with of in to to ensure resection of the the be during colonoscopy is needed to the is the most for bowel preparation can patient and and of and of bowel are associated with risk of bowel and can such ADR when used resection of distal colon polyps or ADR as of a quality in CRC when of is a and of the quality of ADR and proximal serrated lesions a detection for proximal colon serrated lesions and to surveillance be when colonoscopy is performed with high would patients in with or more adenomas, of which are adenomas, colonoscopy in detection of lesions to as the ADR screening that or to patients for colonoscopy, can ADR be used as a quality and at technical or adenoma with is the of the withdrawal colonoscopy (ie, at detection of over colonoscopy in is the of to recommended or of for inflammatory bowel disease in are patients with polyps than are large colon polyps in and in gastroenterologists is the rate of resection of large sessile polyps in completeness of resection of serrated will the need to ADR for quality the of for the of quality the the is removed to include to the of the procedure, and of adverse with and patient quality to of colonoscopy include the of procedure indications CRC and post-polypectomy of of of of post-polypectomy of rates be on of with or of with is generally the most adverse in the during or colonoscopy. of are rates of widely and studies on have in the A of patients risk of of in risk of less than in screening patients rates in screening patients are the patients are generally and to have associated colon that have associated with colorectal more of and of the data, rates in or in in screening patients or to or are that in as as that prevent are or the to against and in the be removed as as of a more or per when is colon, or otherwise of in resection of polyps and in of resection safe likely risk during A to can prevent the the and the colon be used in In with inspection of can help the of of than the risk of in patients with or with that are during the procedure be the of or large that are over the of the for rates can be difficult to over in with procedure is to have the of and the or can to in and in that patient risk in is the most adverse of can be the or In the of or is associated with risk of is associated with a risk of In the of or are and the of for is that the risk of post-polypectomy be rates that or the are In the risk of with polyp proximal colon and of such as polyps in in the proximal colon, rates that help include for sessile or polyps and for polyps resection have associated with polyps and of reducing large sessile and flat lesions as the risk be to the of and/or to and the risk when lesions are resected is with which post-polypectomy is of of In repeat colon and treatment of results in In of post-polypectomy can be post-polypectomy can generally be and the of a polyp can be the and for or in the can be of or of of is adverse results in or for include large polyp proximal colon and the of for be the patient or the colonoscopy in patients have is and be performed at the of the present with and are to usually are repeat colonoscopy, which be performed bowel preparation is can be of or in with is generally at in the proximal and is is of in the of the can include a or with or with which for of repeat colonoscopy is and to the patient are of of screening is recommended in at intervals in the at to intervals patients with or adenomas, at intervals when is a of adenomas on and at for patients adenomas, adenoma with or or in of colonoscopy of colonoscopy for screening and polyp surveillance physicians is effective and patients to and be a for a repeat colonoscopy at intervals a screening colonoscopy in polyps are the be used to for repeat colonoscopy. are or or rates in or of or of of used for adverse rates and to of large prevent adverse resection adverse events resection of large sessile polyp can be performed in patients to or rates the of or patients need to of to the of polyps the of the of or the of be to the and the need for for colonoscopy colonoscopy, the recommended are of recommended intervals between colonoscopies performed for CRC screening and colon polyp surveillance, and rate with 5). of the recommended is associated with These can be in a of examinations for is of in In addition, is for ADR and the of recommended screening and surveillance intervals that and can of primary of quality is to patient care and or removing to colonoscopy be have the recommended the on studies that withdrawal is associated with detection (7, 10, 11, 12, 13, to longer withdrawal times is generally effective in detection studies with results have the be used with are to most effective colonoscopy for ADR have which include on the of precancerous in the to the of flat and depressed lesions and of of flat and depressed adenomas and serrated lesions include in withdrawal technique that associated with the proximal of of and and of the entire colon (7, Finally, technical to can be in the with high that a that detection in with in detection of adenomas in a large a in detection of adenomas A that colonoscopy in detection of adenomas A detection with the to withdrawal times in the These be for to detection with such studies of on with would be of detection rates to recommended ADR and technical have colonoscopy that detection patients for of in in quality as for colonoscopy quality be and in colonoscopy and on quality to be used in a of quality with a of on These a the of in in of is to and in of and with the the quality that colonoscopy 5). that are the quality on the of colonoscopy and in a quality is the most of the in the to CRC and of quality for quality for